Introducing Pulsara Intelligence: AI Tools for Streamlined Emergency Care
In fast-paced clinical settings, documentation often competes with communication and patient care. Pulsara’s mission is to give healthcare workers an...
Hannah Ostrem
:
Jan 15, 2018
Research published recently in JAMA Neurology sought to answer whether there were significant differences in treatment outcomes of a stent retriever combined with local aspiration-based mechanical thrombectomy versus aspiration-based thrombectomy alone in large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke.
These findings add to the argument that treatment effects of mechanical thrombectomy devices in large-vessel acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remain unclear. Further research is needed to understand whether aspiration-assisted mechanical thrombectomy should be the standard of care for LVO, or whether reducing the number of treatment steps and using direct aspiration alone is more beneficial.
What are your thoughts on this? What does your facility do? Let us know in the comments below.
In fast-paced clinical settings, documentation often competes with communication and patient care. Pulsara’s mission is to give healthcare workers an...
September Recap The weather may (finally) be cooling off, but our autumn event season is bringing the heat. 12 down in September and another 12 on...
How an Arkansas hospital improved their door-to-needle benchmark success rates across the board and achieved a record treatment time of 18 minutes. ...