What Are the Benefits of Streamlined Communication?
In an ideal scenario, assembling an effective care team in one place should be simple and fast. Unfortunately, in reality, important details often get lost in translation and precious time is wasted—affecting the ability to deliver effective patient care.
Imagine if pre-hospital EMS practitioners could instantly transmit an ECG to the hospital cardiologist with the ease of a secure app on their smartphone, allowing the patient to bypass the ED and go straight into the CATH lab.

That’s just one small example of how streamlined communication can help care teams provide the best possible care to patients.
Teamwork, communication, and efficiency may improve through training, but often the real culprit behind inefficiency and miscommunication is the processes, not the people. No amount of training nor skill for practitioners can combat the roadblocks introduced by an outdated and disconnected healthcare communication infrastructure.
The Culprit: Non-Interoperable Technologies
Playing a game of telephone wastes precious time in medical emergencies.

Traditional radios, pagers, fax machines, modems, and answering service communications were not designed for real-time team collaboration—and they are less than ideal for acute care correspondence. Every time that information changes hands, there is an increased risk of introducing errors or losing vital information. Using a patchwork system of communication tools relies on information being shared by one person, then captured, written down, or entered into a new system by another, exponentially increasing the risk of miscommunication.
Members of the care team must often make multiple phone calls in order to ensure every player in the patient response is on the same page and ready for treatment. During patient emergencies it is difficult—if not impossible—to determine the availability and readiness of medical resources, even within the hospital.
Most communication between multiple healthcare organizations is achieved using
radios, phones, fax machines, and limited telemedicine solutions—
none of which are interoperable with each other, nor capable of keeping
all patient communication in one secure channel.
Unifying an entire team of healthcare providers across multiple organizations—with one direct channel of communication—has the potential to keep everyone on the same page throughout a patient’s care journey. Studies have indicated reductions in time-to-treatment by 25 to 51% when using mobile technology and telehealth solutions to coordinate time-sensitive patient cases, such as stroke. [2,3,4]
Unite Care Teams Across Organizations
Time and lives are precious. Ready to build and unite your inter-organizational care teams with a solution that works?
Questions to Ask Yourself and Care Team Members:
- How much better could patient care be if communication was streamlined across a healthcare system, regardless of location or organization?
- How could your life, the lives of your fellow clinicians, and the lives of your patients improve with an efficiently coordinated patient care journey?
- How much more efficient could patient care be if each team member has easy access to patient details—providing what they need to know, when they need to know it—on a single channel dedicated to each patient?
Let’s create better patient care together.

1. “Joint Commission Center for Transforming Healthcare Releases Targeted Solutions Tool for Handoff Communications,” Joint Commission Perspectives. 2012; 32(8)
2. Àngels Pedragosa et al., “Impact of a Telemedicine System on Acute Stroke Care in a Community Hospital,” Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 15, no. 5 (July 9, 2009): pp. 260-263, https://doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2009.090102.
3. Ather Taqui et al., “Reduction in Time to Treatment in Prehospital Telemedicine Evaluation and Thrombolysis,” Neurology 88, no. 14 (March 8, 2017): pp. 1305-1312, https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000003786.
4. Gary H. Belt et al., “In-Transit Telemedicine Speeds Ischemic Stroke Treatment,” Stroke 47, no. 9 (August 4, 2016): pp. 2413-2415, https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.116.014270.