Reading time: 3 minutes

What Your Stroke Center Should be Doing for Better Patient Outcomes

By James Woodson, MD

strokelab-732321-edited.pngThere's still much to learn about appropriate identification and triage of our stroke patients, but it is also important to understand what we can do NOW.  
 
A recent article on MedPage Today discussed bridging therapy for stroke patients as a potential tool for improving patient outcomes: 

Bridging therapy made functional independence equally likely for stroke patients transported first to primary stroke centers without endovascular capabilities and peers taken straight to a comprehensive stroke center, a study showed.That strategy of IV thrombolysis within 4.5 hours of symptom onset at one center followed by transport to another where mechanical thrombectomy can be performed within 6 hours of symptom onset was just as likely to produce good functional outcomes 3 months later (modified Rankin scale scores of 2 or below) as transporting patients straight to a thrombectomy-capable center (61.0% versus 50.8%, P=0.26) -- even after multivariable adjustment (P=0.82).

"This study found that patients treated under the drip-and-ship paradigm also benefit from bridging therapy, with no statistically significant difference compared with those treated directly in a comprehensive stroke center," Sonia Alamowitch, MD, of Hôpital Saint-Antoine in Paris, and colleagues reported online in JAMA Neurology.

>> Continue reading.

In the article, Louis R. Caplan, MD, of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston also recommended several changes to all stroke centers:

  • Efforts to upgrade physician personnel and training as well as brain and vascular imaging technology at primary stroke centers
  • Training ambulance personnel to recognize strokes and to identify the more serious strokes and those most likely to have large artery occlusions
  • Giving distance and travel time information to primary stroke centers and comprehensive stroke centers in their jurisdiction
  • Acquisition of enough skilled personnel, technology, and protocols at comprehensive stroke centers
  • Ongoing cooperation and teaching between spoke-and-hub and telemedicine-connected centers
  • Continued research identifying the patients likely to respond to endovascular thrombectomy without or after IV tPA 
Take a moment to review Dr. Caplan’s recommendations and ask yourself a few questions:
  • How do we operationalize educating all prehospital clinicians on modern stroke scales to identify strokes and large vessel occlusions?
  • How do we provide distance and travel time information to primary stroke centers and comprehensive stroke centers?
  • Do we have the best technology and protocols to enable our personnel?
  • How do we provide feedback to all team members and keep collaborative communication going between all team members (EMS, Hub, and Spoke)? EMS, ED, Pharmacy, Registration, Radiology, Lab, Neurology, Cath Lab, Interventionalist, Rapid Response….
Remember, YOUR entire stroke team does not work for a single department, facility or EMS agency.  It takes an army.  It takes all of us. If you are struggling with any of these questions, contact us.  We can help you right NOW!
 
LEARN ABOUT PULSARA
 
 
 
ARTICLE CATEGORIES: Stroke
Share This Article    
James Woodson, MD

James Woodson, MD

James is a board certified Emergency Physician, and is the Founder, CEO, and President of Pulsara.

Read more articles by James Woodson, MD

Get instant blog updates from the Pulsara team sent directly to your inbox!

The Future of Healthcare Communication: Connected Teams

Connect Yours Now

Schedule a Demo